The IPKat BLOG – Page 63

In: The IPKat BLOG

Sculptor sues glass maker over Swedish transposition of Article 20 DSM Directive and to test its temporal application

http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/12/sculptor-sues-glass-maker-over-swedish.html As readers may be aware, Articles 18-22 of the Directive (EU) 2019/790 (DSM Directive) [IPKat coverage here] establish protective measures for authors and performers that license or transfer the exclusive economic rights over their works and performances to third parties for the purpose of exploitation. Specifically, Article 20 of... Continue reading
In: The IPKat BLOG

Sunday Surprises

http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/12/sunday-surprises_24.html The final rounds of the holiday season are finally here, and so are some interesting IP events. The DSA and Platform Regulation Conference 2024 Image via Pexels On 15 and 16 February at the Amsterdam Law School (University of Amsterdam) “The DSA and Platform Regulation Conference 2024” is taking... Continue reading
In: The IPKat BLOG

Book Review: Intellectual Property and the Design of Nature

http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/12/book-review-intellectual-property-and.html As a plant intellectual property nerd, this Kat was delighted to get her hands on the new book Intellectual Property and the Design of Nature (Oxford University Press, 2023), edited by Jose Bellido and Brad Sherman. But don’t stop reading if your passion lies along other branches of IP... Continue reading
In: The IPKat BLOG

Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!

http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/12/never-too-late-if-you-missed-ipkat-last_23.html If you’ve been too wrapped up with preparations for the holiday season, here’s a summary of the IP news that you might have missed last week: Patents This Kat is still contemplating which IP books to put on her Christmas wish-list… Rose Hughes outlined the recent EPO Board of Appeal... Continue reading
In: The IPKat BLOG

The IPKat EPO Boards of Appeal Year in Review 2023

http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/12/the-ipkat-epo-boards-of-appeal-year-in.html PatKat reviewing the year It is time once more for the IPKat patent year in review! Pour yourself a glass of mulled wine, curl up with your favourite feline and catch-up on your EPO case law. G2/21 and the mysteries of plausibility The topic that this Kat has spent the... Continue reading
In: The IPKat BLOG

Basic IP fundamentals: a recent survey among the IP community

http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/12/basic-ip-fundamentals-recent-survey.html On 30 November 2023, the Center for Intellectual Property Understanding (CIPU) published the findings of a survey on “Intellectual Property Principle – What the IP Community regards as important” (executive summary and slides). The survey was conducted by response:AI, an independent market research firm. The survey The survey... Continue reading
In: The IPKat BLOG

After the Swedes, it’s time for the Germans to ask the CJEU to clarify copyright protection of works of applied art in USM Haller referral

http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/12/after-swedes-its-time-for-germans-to.html At what conditions can works of applied art be protected by copyright under EU law? If this question feels like déjà-vu, it is because it is. Indeed, it was only some weeks ago that the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen (Sweden) made a referral (Mio, C-580/23) [IPKat here and... Continue reading
In: The IPKat BLOG

Court of Appeal of England and Wales reminds rightholders to monitor trade mark registers to avoid acquiescence

http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/12/court-of-appeal-of-england-and-wales.html In a recent decision ([2023] EWCA Civ 1451) which is relevant to all trade mark practitioners, the Court of Appeal of England and Wales (the Court) has departed from EU case-law and held that the defence of statutory acquiescence, in respect of UK trade mark infringement, only requires that the owner... Continue reading
In: The IPKat BLOG

Crystallising the interpretation of G 2/21 (T 1989/19)

http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/12/crystallising-interpretation-of-g-221-t.html The Board of Appeal in T 1989/19 provides further guidance on the interpretation of the Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G2/21. The reasoning in T 1989/19 is aligned with the interpretation recently taken by the referring Board to G2/21 (IPKat). In short, to be relied on for inventive step, a purported technical effect must be encompassed by... Continue reading
In: The IPKat BLOG

Breaking news: UK Supreme Court confirms that an inventor under UK Patents Act 1977 must be a natural person

http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/12/breaking-news-uk-supreme-court-confirms.html The UK Supreme Court has today handed down its decision Thaler v Comptroller [2023] UKSC 49. The judgment under appeal by the Court of Appeal was reported here. In a short judgment, the Supreme Court agrees with the majority in the Court of Appeal and rejects the appeal from... Continue reading